Blockchain Entities

Overview

The last chapter covered Phala’s architecture, whereas this page will touch on Phala’s entities, the types of nodes that make Phala Network.

In Phala Network, there are three kinds of entities:

  • Client, which operates on normal devices without any special hardware requirements;
  • Worker, which operates on Secure Enclave and serves as the computation nodes for confidential smart contracts;
  • Gatekeeper, which operates on Secure Enclave and serves as the authorities and key managers;

The image below visualizes the interaction between Phala’s entities.

Phala Network

The basic design of Phala Network is meant to ensure the security and confidentiality of the blockchain and its Phat Contract. However, with more security improvements, Phala Network can defend against advanced attacks.

Entity Key Initialization

In Phala, the communication between any entity should be encrypted, so each entity generates the following entities key pairs with a pseudorandom number generator during initialization:

  1. IdentityKey
    • an sr25519 key pair to uniquely identify an entity;
  2. EcdhKey
    • an sr25519 key pair for secure communication;

pRuntime Initialization

During initialization, pRuntime automatically generates the entity key pairs above with a random number generator. The generated key pairs are managed in pRuntime in the Secure Enclave, which means the workers and gatekeepers can only use it with the limited APIs exported by pRuntime, and can never gain the plaintext key pairs to read the encrypted data out of the Secure Enclave.

The generated key pairs can be locally encrypted and cached on the disk with Sealing and decrypted and loaded when restarting. This applies to both gatekeepers and workers.

Secure Communication Channels

The EcdhKey public key in the pRuntime of a worker or gatekeeper is publicly available. Therefore a ECDH key agreement protocol can be applied to establish a secure communication channel between a worker (or a gatekeeper) and any other entity non-interactively.

A channel between two entities, A and B is denoted as $Channel(Pk_A, Pk_B)$, where $Pk_A$ and $Pk_B$ is the public key their ECDH key pairs correspondingly. A shared secret can be derived from one’s ECDH private key and the counterpart’s public key via the Diffie Hellman algorithm. Then the final communication key CommKey(A, B) can be calculated via a one-way function. Finally, CommKey(A, B) is used to encrypt the messages between the two entities.

In Khala, the EcdhKey is an sr25519 key pair. We can adopt the child key derivation (CKD) functions from Bitcoin BIP32 to derive CommKey(A, B) from the key agreed by ECDH.

The messages are end-to-end encrypted with aes-gcm-256.

The public key of the entities are registered on-chain. So we can build on-chain or off-chain communication channels:

  • On-chain Communication
    1. Both A and B knows each other’s public key from the blockchain. They can derives CommKey(A, B);
    2. A posts a cipher message encrypted by CommKey(A, B) to the blockchain;
    3. B receives it, and decrypt it with CommKey(A, B);
  • Off-chain (A is off-chain and B is an on-chain worker) Communication
    1. A can learn B’s public key from the blockchain and derive CommKey(A, B);
    2. A learns the API endpoint of B from its WorkerInfo in WorkerState on chain;
    3. A sends a signed cipher message (encrypted by CommKey(A, B)) with its public key to B directly;
    4. B gets A’s public key from the message, and derive CommKey(A, B) to decrypt it;

Client-worker Payload Example

A client communicates with a worker only for contract invocation. An invocation consists of at least the following payloads.

{
    from: Client_IdentityKey,
    payload: {
        to: Contract_IdentityKey,
        input: "0xdeadbeef",
    },
    nonce: 12345,
    sig: UserSignature,
}
  • nonce is necessary for defending against Double-spend and Replay Attack.
  • from field shows the identity of caller, and can be verified with sig. from will be further passed to contract.
  • Since a worker can run multiple contracts (or even different instances of the same contract), to is needed to specify the invocation target.
  • input encodes the invoked function and arguments, it should be serialized according to the ABI of contracts.

Serialization

EcdhKey Rotation

Unlike the IdentityKey which shows the identity of a worker or gatekeeper thus should not be changed, we recommend a regular rotation of the EcdhKey to ensure the security of the communication channels between different entities. In the future, pRuntime will automatically rotate the managed EcdhKey key after certain time interval.

Edit this page on GitHub